From: James J. Lippard ([email protected])
Date: Thu Sep 09 1999 - 15:19:54 MST
Larry/Linda: In case you missed this request, here it is again.
I've looked at the table of contents for the first issue of SRAM and the
list of members of the Council for Scientific Medicine (see
http://www.hcrc.org/sram/index.html and
http://www.hcrc.org/sram/contents.html), but I haven't found a list of
editorial board members. The three listed editors are Paul Kurtz, Wallace
Sampson, and Lewis Vaughn. The authors of articles in the first issue are
Wallace Sampson, Mahlon Wagner, Bela Scheiber, George Ulett, Saul Green,
Victor Stenger, John Renner.
Which article by which of these authors contains plagiarism, and from what
source(s)? If you're going to make such a charge, you should certainly
back it up.
Jim Lippard [email protected] http://www.discord.org/
Unsolicited bulk email charge: $500/message. Don't send me any.
PGP Fingerprint: 0C1F FE18 D311 1792 5EA8 43C8 7AD2 B485 DE75 841C
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 12:52:37 -0700 (MST)
From: James J. Lippard <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [beliefs] Re: No Subject
I second the request--further, what was the source being plagiarized from,
so we can examine this for ourselves. Has a side-by-side comparison been
put together by anyone, along the lines of
http://www.primenet.com/~lippard/Bakerreport.txt? (This case involved
someone still on the _Skeptical Inquirer_ editorial board.)
Jim Lippard [email protected] http://www.discord.org/
Unsolicited bulk email charge: $500/message. Don't send me any.
PGP Fingerprint: 0C1F FE18 D311 1792 5EA8 43C8 7AD2 B485 DE75 841C
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Kurt Youngmann wrote:
> > You said:
> >
> > As a relatively new publication, ScRAM still has to prove its worth. The
> > fact that it published plagiarized work in its first issue is not an
> > auspicious start. That the plagiarer remains on its editorial board is not
> > a good thing. That ScRAM's publisher, Prometheus, is having that plagiarer
> > edit a book is a bad thing. If at length ScRAM actually publishes Long's
> > study, it may prove an irretrievable embarrassment for the publication,
> > indicating that its review process is suspect. I have not yet read the
> > finished article, but no amount of editing can make a silk's purse out of
> > the sow's ear that was Long's "experiment" in the first place.
> >
> > -- Larry Sarner & Linda Rosa
> >
>
> Seems I missed something a ways back. Can you please tell me which was the
> plagiarized work and who the plagiarer is? I no longer have the issue in my
> possession.
>
> Thanx very much,
>
> Kurt Youngmann
> [email protected]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online.
> Start with up to 150 Points for joining!
> http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/805
>
>
> eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/beliefs
> http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online.
Start with up to 150 Points for joining!
http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/805
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/beliefs
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:49:47 MST